Galaxy Meteor is an interesting piece, on a number of
levels.
It is a third party rendition of Cybertron/Galxay Force Starscream, an anomaly by itself, as most of
the third party market is still hyper focused on the G1 collector. It is also a
figure that was seemingly rescued from oblivion by a concerted effort by some
Transformer Twitter bigwigs spreading enough hype and etailers settling on a
$99 price point, down from the initially projected $130.
And then, it’s a pretty interesting figure on its own.
Galaxy Meteor has some really excellent articulation, and is
capable of holding lots of cool poses. Some of the articulation is the result
of transformation joints, such as in the hips and knees, as well as a limited
ankle that is an intentional joint. He comes with a pretty solid arsenal,
including a blaster and twin swords which, like the original, official figure,
are concealed inside the large wing parts that hang from the robot shoulders.
The ends of these shoulder wing parts also display barrels of blasters, so the
figure is quite heavily armed. The shoulder parts are mounted on hinges that
allow them to move independently of the arms, a big step up from the original
figure.
In order to deploy the swords, the original figure had to
raise its entire arm, and then was basically capable of using them in a
downward swinging motion, like a chop more than anything that one would do with
a sword. The hinged parts on Galaxy Meteor allow for poses that feature the
swords, action-y looks that take advantage of the dynamic, vibrant nature of
the toy. While this allows for cooler poses and makes the swords usable, the
entire shoulder block part moves on these hinges, and separates from the rest
of the body. I’m not the best at posing figures, in fact, I really suck at it,
but this means that the shoulder parts are visibly separate from the rest of
the figure, and that ruins the profile of the toy. It can’t really be helped,
because while I am also not an engineer, I cannot see any way that the design
could have avoided this separation.
The little chest mounted blasters can be moved as well, as
was the case on the Supreme class official figure, but not the Voyager. Galaxy
Meteor comes with a Cyber Key which is unnecessary for play, but does store in
the back of the figure, just like the original. It also has three different
faces which are easily swapped in and out on the head, the best of which is a
grinning face.
The transformation is surprisingly complicated, given the
incredible simplicity of the original official figure. It follows the same
basic pattern of the original, most noticeably in the legs and how they flip
around and fold up into the front half of the jet mode, but this figure does a
real good job of filling in all of the empty space underneath the rear half of
the jet, which the original only did through the bulkiness of the plastic. The
jet mode is futuristic and accurate to the Cybertron
original, which is such a distinctive vehicle, and one that is only Cybertron Starscream. Both of the swords
and the blaster rifle are accessible in the jet mode, which is really only as
successful as the originals’ alt mode. This has always been a good design, as a
robot, and an interesting idea for a jet, kinda sorta angling for the
Cybertronian pyramid jet design that the Seekers had for those few seconds of
the very first episode of the G1 cartoon. This jet mode comes in way short of that
concept, but hints of it can be seen in the design, just executed far, far
better and more aerodynamically. It is the best of the Cybertronian Seeker alt
modes, better than the Generations altmode to be sure, and in this sleeker, thinner version, it does look pretty
strong.
Galaxy Meteor has a pretty interesting back story. It was
originally announced a while back, and had been dormant for so long that people
had begun to wonder if the project had been shelved. Then reviewers started
getting samples, and articles and pictures began appearing online. It seemed
like the release was drawing nearer, and then, it came out that MakeToys was
having trouble securing the numbers via preorder to fill out the initial
production run. Talk circulated that the figure was going to be shelved,
probably in an Indiana Jones-type warehouse filled with unknown treasures. Several
reviewers took up a campaign to raise awareness and hype for the figure, which
personally, was working, but the $130 price tag was too much of a turn off.
From the first images I had seen of Galaxy Meteor, I knew that this was going
on my list of “one of these days” purchases, the “Black Friday/Cyber
Monday/TFCon Weekend/random price drop” sale buys.
And then, MakeToys themselves announced that they had,
thanks to an uptick in interest, secured a deal with the major North American
etailers to offer the figure at $99, for at least a limited time. My preorder
was placed within minutes of this news. It’s hard to tell if this story is true
or not, or if Galaxy Meteor was really in any danger of being forgotten, or if
this was all some kind of strange maneuver to drum up support for a figure that
may not have had much. It is a good figure, make no mistake, and at $99, an
excellent purchase.
But at the original price, one questions if Galaxy Meteor is
worth the money. That $100 threshold is a mystical demarcation: below it, and
practically everything seems like an amazing value; but above it, and many
things start to fit the description of being “nice, but.” And Galaxy Meteor
would most definitely have been the later. Also strange is that at TFCon USA
2017, physical copies of a Thundercracker and a Skywarp repaint were on
display, and it seems a bit strange that a company that had such difficulty
getting interest for the actual character usage of the mold would already be
teasing or advertising repaints as characters that never appeared in this form.
It is totally possible that those repaints were just there to serve as display
pieces, and that there is no real intention to release them, as now months have
passed and no additional word on this matter has surfaced. But here arises a
pair of interesting questions:
Would anyone buy the repaints? And, why did MakeToys have
such difficulty selling Galaxy Meteor?
The answer to the first part is pretty easy: yes, I’d buy
the other two, but. Galaxy Meteor is such a good figure, both in hand and
aesthetically, and I am a Seeker fan, so if a quality Seeker figure is
repainted into other Seekers, it pretty much automatically makes my shopping
list. If the repaints were available at the $99 price that Galaxy Meteor wound
up at, I would eventually get the other two. There wouldn’t be much of a rush,
(he lies to his reader…. –mr), as it would probably be the case that the
repaints would be lower priorities compared to some other third party pieces
that are currently being actively pursued, and unless preorders were for figure
several months in the future, I may not even preorder them, but rather wait for
them to come into stock (he lies again….. –mr). The trio would certainly look
good together, and again, the base figure is a good one, so the other two would
be a pretty easily justified purchase. Will they ever happen? Who’s to say?
But, in the event that they do, I will probably buy them.
The other question is a bit harder to answer. Why was there
no real enthusiasm for the figure? Seems strange, as other MakeToys products
are generally highly anticipated, and the third party market is still humming
along, despite think pieces predicting its demise or a sense of apathy that may
be developing among fans. There’s a theory of mine that goes like this: Galaxy
Meteor is a piece from an era of Transformers that the third party market isn’t
looking to fill.
Even looks clean from the rear. |
From its beginnings, the third party market was mostly
concerned with plugging holes in Hasbros’ “Classics” or Masterpiece rosters, specifically are related to G1 characters.
There was no “Classics” Devastator, or at least, not an acceptable one, and so
the third parties set themselves to fill that void. Even prior to that, there
was no acceptable “Classics” Ultra Magnus, and so the City Commander add on was
birthed to address that need. But Galaxy Meteor is from a far younger series,
as Cybetron/Galaxy Force comes in
2005-6, just before the first live action movie and Animated, and so, at this very moment, is only 12 years old. Has
enough time passed for there to be a real market for the nostalgia for that
series? Or, are collectors and fans for whom Cybertron is their G1 old enough and possessed of the disposable
income enough to buy in to a third party market that is producing figures of
the characters they grew up with? I think I’d have to guess no on that. My wife
and I were talking about this once: if you have a fan who grew up with Cybertron, they are probably in their
late teens or very early 20’s right now. For that fan, who may very well be a
collector as well, a $100 figure is a great expense, and even if we work under
the wonderful assumption that said fan could just appeal to their parents for
such a pricey piece is likely to be met with some degree of skepticism as to
why a toy costs $100. Parents just don’t understand, you know? So it may be the
case that the market for this era of figure is just not large and self-sufficient
enough right now to sustain itself, and Galaxy Meteor wound up being the first
potential casualty of it. Maybe had MakeToys waited a few more years this would
have been an instant success, as the target demographic may have had better the
means to buy in. But, at the same time, something different in the third party
market is usually a real good thing, and aside from being a good piece, it is
nice to see something that isn’t just another G1 character hit the market. It’s
not like G1 fans and collectors have no interest in a Cybertron character, they just may not be as enthusiastic to jump
at the preorder for one. There has been a fairly noticeable move in the third
party realm to the Beast era of Transformers at present, as well as a few
preliminary attempts at filling gaps in the live action movie roster, so it may
be the case that the market is beginning to move away from the straight G1
offering; where this ultimately goes, and what figures we get in the process
remains to be seen.
Overall, Galaxy Meteor is a very good figure, and it
deserves a spot in your collection. Certainly the fact that it is a Cybertron character may not interest
some collectors, but the figure is of quality all around, and if people are
able to look beyond the series it honors, they should be pretty happy with the
outcome. But as a qualifier, the truest sense of value for this piece is
getting it at the $99 adjusted price. Any higher than that and it might be best
to wait for a sale.
No comments:
Post a Comment